Subject: RE: 3rd party registration (was RE: [Sip] SIP MIB ietf-sip-mib comments)

From: "Kevin Lingle \(klingle\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 10:04:41 -0400

jean-francois, 
at this point, i'd vote to simply remove the object. 
kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) 
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:02 AM
To: Dean Willis
Cc: Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat); SIP IETF; Romascanu, Dan ((Dan));
Jean-Francois Mule; Kevin Lingle (klingle); Juergen Schoenwaelder
Subject: Re: 3rd party registration (was RE: [Sip] SIP MIB ietf-sip-mib
comments)

At this point, the value of finishing this MIB far outweighs the value
this discussion will add to the MIB. I will happily support whatever the
author choose to do to close this issue.

Cullen

On May 10, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Dean Willis wrote:

>
> On May 9, 2006, at 2:23 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
>>
>> I have heard of at least one implementation that supports 3rd party 
>> registration.
>
> But do we have any need to track and report on 3rd party registrations

> at the MIB level differently than we do 1st party registrations?
>
> Or is a registration just a registration from a peg-count perspective?
>
> --
> Dean
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [email-masked] for questions on current sip Use 
> [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip