Subject: RE: [Sipping] Diagnostics again -- really

From: "Beck01, Wolfgang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 16:53:00 +0100

Hi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:41 PM
> 
> [..]
> As the draft points out diagnostics from inner portions of an
> operator's network would be shared with outsiders only in 
> very very rare circumstances.
> 
> I don't find the mechanism described in the draft to be in any way
> effective in  real world networks
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tom Gray
> 
Operators prefer standardized debugging solutions even if they don't
pass debugging information to neighbouring networks. The very, very rare
situations you are talking of are the ones that are really painful.
Risk-exposure is risk-probability x risk-cost and therefore it can be
appropriate to define a debugging standard even if it is seldomly
used across networks.

Btw Warning-Headers already contain host names that could be used
to analyze a SIP network.

--
Wolfgang Beck
T-Systems Nova GmbH 
_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP