Subject: RE: feature interaction, was: Re: [Sipping] draft on SIP architecturalprinciples

From: "Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:52:32 -0500

The essence of that would require new development within the SS7 space
to enable indication that one party to the call was a conference bridge.
I don't know of anyone that is interested in doing so.  But, if you did
that work, it would be at ITU-T most likely.

Mike 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email-masked] 
>[mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Markus Hofmann
>Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:16 PM
>To: SIPPING LIST
>Subject: Re: feature interaction,was: Re: [Sipping] draft on 
>SIP architecturalprinciples
>
>Michael Hammer (mhammer) wrote:
>
>> If you insist on using PSTN conference bridges, you can continue to 
>> get PSTN conference behavior. :)
>
>I'm just grounded in reality.
>
>> Not everything will be backwards-compatible.
>
>That doesn't mean that we shouldn't try finding solutions that 
>make sense and even work with the "old stuff".
>
>-Markus
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
>This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use 
>[email-masked] for questions on current sip 
>Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP
>

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP