Subject: Re: [Sipping] Some initial issues regardingdraft-dawes-sipping-debug-event-01

From: "Dale Worley" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:12:08 -0500

From: "Dawes, Peter, VF-Group" <[email-masked]>

   My preference for combining the drafts is to put everything in the event
   package draft. Is it viable to define a new SIP header field in an event
   package description, or would it be clearer to have a completely new
   draft with a new title?

I see no reason why both definitions cannot be in one draft.  Which
draft name you use for it is probably not significant, since the name
will become irrelevant once the draft becomes an RFC.

Dale

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP