Subject: Re: [siprec] Consensus calls from session 1 of interim - Successful

From: "Hutton, Andrew" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 17:45:01 +0200

Hi,

I have seen no objections to these items so can the editors go ahead and incorporate these changes in their next update.

I see Leon as already done this in the 03 architecture draft. 

Regards
Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf Of Elwell, John
> Sent: 20 September 2011 09:59
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [siprec] Consensus calls from session 1 of interim
> 
> There were no objections on the call to the following. If anyone else
> has objections, please raise within one week (by 2011-09-27).
> 
> Architecture:
> - Modifications to figure 1 (show RTCP, show as a single CS)
> - Make figure 4 more generic, to cover any decomposed SIP UA acting as
> SRC (e.g., RTC-Web, MEDIACTRL).
> 
> Protocol:
> - Text improvements along the lines described in slide 5.
> 
> Metadata:
> - Keep UML in the document, but make it clear it is non-normative. Also
> make clear how XML relates to the model.
> - Remove ExtensionData from the model, since the model is not an on-
> the-wire protocol and does not need a compatibility mechanism.
> - Include associate and dissociate times for a CS.
> - Allow zero or more participants in a CS.
> - Have a single XML element to represent both name and address
> (structure to be determined).
> - Model associate/dissociate times for participants with media streams
> as attributes of a UML association.
> - Remove the redundant <mode/> element.
> 
> John
> 
> _______________________________________________
> siprec mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec