Subject: [Softwires] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-13: (with COMMENT)

From: "Benoit Claise" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:23:01 -0800

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for addressing Dave Thaler's recommendations.

The only point that looks under specified to me is:
      dsliteNATBindMappingExtAddressType OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX InetAddressType
          MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
          STATUS current
          DESCRIPTION
            "Address type for the mapping's external address.
             A value other than IPv4(1) would be unexpected."
          ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 4 }

    dsliteNATBindMappingIntAddressType OBJECT-TYPE
          SYNTAX InetAddressType
          MAX-ACCESS read-only
          STATUS current
          DESCRIPTION
             "Address type of the mapping's internal address.
              A value other than ipv4z(3) would be unexpected."
          ::= { dsliteNATBindEntry 8 }

What does it mean: "other value would be unexpected"?
Is this allowed or not?

Note: I have recompiled the MIB, I trust you on this point.

Regards, Benoit