Subject: Re: [lamps] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8649 (6129)

From: Megan Ferguson <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 23:40:08 -0700

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted as requested.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

On Apr 24, 2020, at 4:43 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <[email-masked]> wrote:

> RFC Editor, please delete this empty report.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben
> 
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:37:25PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8649,
>> "Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6129
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Becca Sanderson X <[email-masked]>
>> 
>> Section: RFC2119
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> 
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> 
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> 
>> 
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8649 (draft-ietf-lamps-hash-of-root-key-cert-extn-07)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Hash Of Root Key Certificate Extension
>> Publication Date    : August 2019
>> Author(s)           : R. Housley
>> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>> Source              : Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>