Subject: Re: [Spud] [Stackevo] New Version Notification for draft-trammell-stackevo-newtea-00.txt

From: Szilveszter Nadas <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:56:29 +0000

Hi Brian,

Following up my thinking in the SPUD scope mail, a question, to version-01: 

What do you think about something like this as an option for 5.3: an explicit, safe to ignore marking where it is possible to establish trust relationship and not-ignored markings may have reply and consequences? (e.g. “Exposure of cost of choice”)

Cheers,
Sz.