Subject: [Teas] one question about draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo

From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:29:05 +0000

Hi, 

    Did not make it to the mic ,but i would like to share my opinions about the first question raised by Xufeng: whether the packet specific attributes should be moved out to a separate/augmented model?

   I think the technology specific parts should be moved to a different model given that we want this TE-topology to be technology agnostic and applies to both controller and device. I think TE-YANG model is taking similar approach. 

  A point worth noting is that, following the same logic, the following ones should also be probably moved out: 

                  |  +--rw time-division-multiplex-capable
                  |  |  +--rw minimum-lsp-bandwidth?   decimal64
                  |  |  +--rw indication?              enumeration

Regards,
Xian