Subject: Re: [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review

From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:25:57 +0000

Hi Pavan,

Thank you for reviewing the document and providing comments.

We have uploaded a new revision that addresses your comments. Please see below with <RG> for replies.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc/

 A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-05

At this time, there are no open issues for this document and we believe the document is ready for WG LC.

Thanks,
Rakesh (On behalf of the authors and contributors)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM
Subject: <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>

Authors, Hi!

I did a quick review of the current version of <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc>.

Couple of nits. Please see if you can take care of those in the next revision.

- There are quite a few places in the draft where the term "transport networks" is used. In some places it appears to imply "transport networks of all types", while in other places (like in Section 3) it means "non packet-based transport networks". Please see if you can make the usage seem consistent (might have to make some edits in Section 3).

<RG> Document updated with "non-packet transport networks".

- Update the list of authors/editors in the first page as per the guidance provided in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.1. (please see if you can adhere to the "5 authors" limit; as an alternative, consider having just one or two editors with others listed in the Contributors/Acknowledgements section)

<RG> Document updated to address this.

Thanks,
Rakesh

Regards,
-Pavan