Subject: Re: [Teas] New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07.txt

From: Dhruv Dhody <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 19:38:07 +0530

Hi Lou,

We were in the midst of updating the TE service mapping yang. We considered
the approach that you suggested, but the authors believe that having a new
mapping yang model that maps various service models to various TE models
works best and want to continue with this approach. We could discuss this
point during the IETF meeting, let us know if you have a strong opinion on
this?

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:27 PM Leeyoung <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Lou,
>
>
>
> I see your point. If we were to do only L3VPN per se, it would be OK to
> augment L3SM model to add TE related parameters. But here we have LxSM
> where x=1,2,3 and ACTN VN (in addition, there could be another service
> model we have not seen such as L0SM) and it would more scalable and
> flexible to have one TE Service Mapping Model to which all service models
> are covered as Giuseppe pointed out.
>
>
>
> Another point is that in most cases the top level service orchestrator is
> dealing with many different services together and there may be correlations
> across different services it offers. In such case, having a TE-Service
> mapping model would make sense.
>
>
>
> Just my thought.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Young
>
>
>
> *From:* Fioccola Giuseppe [mailto:[email-masked]]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2018 3:19 AM
> *To:* Lou Berger <[email-masked]>; Leeyoung <[email-masked]>;
> [email-masked]
> *Cc:* Dhruv Dhody <[email-masked]>; Jeff Tantsura <
> [email-masked]>; Daniele Ceccarelli <[email-masked]>;
> Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[email-masked]>
> *Subject:* R: New Version Notification for
> draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07.txt
>
>
>
> Hi Lou, Young,
>
> This is an interesting point. The augmentation for LxSM is possible but,
> in this case, it could not be the right way because it is a less flexible
> approach. In addition te-topology-ids and te-tp-ids are probably only
> optional information for the interface between Customer and Service
> Provider. So, in my opinion, it would be convenient to have a Service
> Mapping Yang Model.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Giuseppe
>
>
>
> *Da:* Lou Berger [mailto:[email-masked] <[email-masked]>]
> *Inviato:* martedì 1 maggio 2018 15:05
> *A:* Leeyoung; Vishnu Pavan Beeram; [email-masked]
> *Cc:* Dhruv Dhody; Fioccola Giuseppe; Jeff Tantsura; Daniele Ceccarelli
> *Oggetto:* Re: New Version Notification for
> draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07.txt
>
>
>
> Hi Young,
>
> see below.
>
> On 4/5/2018 10:57 AM, Leeyoung wrote:
>
> Hi Pavan and Lou,
>
>
>
> We have updated the draft to incorporate Pavan's comment (during London
> meeting) to generalize the model for TE.
>
>
>
> Regarding the mapping, we have added options for all three:
>
>
>
> -              VN (ACTN VN model)
>
> -              Single abstract node in TE topology (TE-topology model)
>
> -              List of tunnels (TE-tunnel model)
>
>
>
> See the changes as follows:
>
>
>
>
>
>          +---------+          +-------------+         +----------+
>
>          |  L3SM   | <------> |             | <-----> | ACTN VN  |
>
>          +---------+          |             |         |  Model   |
>
>                               |             |         +----------+
>
>                               |             |
>
>          +---------+          | TE-Service  |         +----------+
>
>          |  L2SM   | <------> |Mapping Model| <-----> | TE-Topo  |
>
>          +---------+          |             |         |   Model  |
>
>                               |             |         +----------+
>
>                               |             |
>
>          +---------+          |             |         +----------+
>
>          |  L1CSM  | <------> |             | <-----> | TE-Tunnel|
>
>          +---------+          |             |         |   Model  |
>
>                               +-------------+         +----------+
>
>
>
> Let us know what you think.
>
>
> I think having a way to map from the LxSMs to  te topology makes a lot of
> sense.  Although, personally I would have looked at augmenting the existing
> models with te-topology-ids and te-tp-ids before defining a new module.
> This said, what's really important is the opinion of WG contributors.  So
> I'd be more interested in hearing what others think of the approach.
>
> Lou
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Young & Dhruv
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 4. YANG Data Tree
>
>
>
> module: ietf-te-service-mapping
>
>     +--rw te-service-mapping
>
>        +--rw service-mapping
>
>        |  +--rw mapping-list* [map-id]
>
>        |     +--rw map-id            uint32
>
>        |     +--rw map-type?         map-type
>
>        |     +--rw (service)?
>
>        |     |  +--:(l3vpn)
>
>        |     |  |  +--rw l3vpn-ref?        ->
> /l3:l3vpn-svc/vpn-services/vpn-
>
> service/vpn-id
>
>        |     |  +--:(l2vpn)
>
>        |     |  |  +--rw l2vpn-ref?        ->
> /l2:l2vpn-svc/vpn-services/vpn-
>
> service/vpn-id
>
>        |     |  +--:(l1vpn)
>
>        |     |     +--rw l1vpn-ref?        -> /l1:l1cs/service/service-
>
> list/subscriber-l1vc-id
>
>        |     +--rw (te)?
>
>        |        +--:(actn-vn)
>
>        |        |  +--rw actn-vn-ref?      -> /vn:actn/vn/vn-list/vn-id
>
>        |        +--:(te-topo)
>
>        |        |  +--rw vn-topology-id?   te-types:te-topology-id
>
>        |        |  +--rw abstract-node?    ->
> /nw:networks/network/node/node-
>
> id
>
>        |        +--:(te-tunnel)
>
>        |           +--rw te-tunnel-list*   te:tunnel-ref
>
>        +--rw site-mapping
>
>           +--rw mapping-list* [map-id]
>
>              +--rw map-id         uint32
>
>              +--rw (service)?
>
>              |  +--:(l3vpn)
>
>              |  |  +--rw l3vpn-ref?     -> /l3:l3vpn-svc/sites/site/site-id
>
>              |  +--:(l2vpn)
>
>              |  |  +--rw l2vpn-ref?     -> /l2:l2vpn-svc/sites/site/site-id
>
>              |  +--:(l1vpn)
>
>              |     +--rw l1vpn-ref?     -> /l1:l1cs/access/uni-list/UNI-ID
>
>              +--rw (te)?
>
>                 +--:(actn-vn)
>
>                 |  +--rw actn-vn-ref?   -> /vn:actn/ap/access-point-
>
> list/access-point-id
>
>                 +--:(te)
>
>                    +--rw ltp?           te-types:te-tp-id
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]
> <[email-masked]>]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 9:43 AM
> To: Dhruv Dhody <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]>; Giuseppe
> Fioccola <[email-masked]>
> <[email-masked]>; Jeff Tantsura <[email-masked]>
> <[email-masked]>; Daniele Ceccarelli <[email-masked]>
> <[email-masked]>; Leeyoung <[email-masked]>
> <[email-masked]>
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07.txt
>
> has been successfully submitted by Young Lee and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
>
>
> Name:                  draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang
>
> Revision:              07
>
> Title:                     Traffic Engineering and Service Mapping Yang
> Model
>
> Document date: 2018-04-05
>
> Group:                  Individual Submission
>
> Pages:                  19
>
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07.txt
>
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang/
>
> Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07
>
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang
>
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07
>
>
>
> Abstract:
>
>    This document provides a YANG data model to map service model (e.g.,
>
>    L3SM) and Traffic Engineering model (e.g., TE Tunnel or ACTN VN
>
>    model). This model is referred to as TE service Mapping Model. This
>
>    model is applicable to the operation's need for a seamless control
>
>    and management of their VPN services with TE tunnel support.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
>
>
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle
> persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante
> dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora
> abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di
> darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua
> distruzione, Grazie.
>
> *This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain
> privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination,
> copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and
> advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. *
>
> *Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.*
>
>
>