Subject: [trill] Solicit comments and suggestions for the new version draft of "draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active-02"

From: Haoweiguo <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 03:50:30 +0000

Hi All,
I have just posted a new version draft of "Analysis of Active-Active Connection Solutions". In this draft,most of the current TRILL active-active related solutions are briefly described, analysed and compared. Comparing with previous version, main change points of the draft include:
1. Add the solution of consistent nickname allocation per edge group.
2. Local forwarding behavior for CMT,centralized replication and tunneling among edge RBs.
3. Remove and modify non accurate descriptions.
4. Add the solution of ESADI extension for information syncronization.
5. Modify some descriptions of centralized replication solution.
Comments and suggestions are welcomed.
Thanks
weiguo

________________________________________
发件人: [email-masked] [[email-masked]]
发送时间: 2014年5月20日 11:22
收件人: Liyizhou; Muhammad Durrani; Hongjun Zhai; Susan Hares; Haoweiguo; Susan Hares; Liyizhou; ZTE Corporation; [email-masked]; Haoweiguo
主题: New Version Notification for draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active-02.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Weiguo Hao and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active
Revision:       02
Title:          Analysis of Active-Active Connection Solutions
Document date:  2014-05-20
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          19
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active-02
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hao-trill-analysis-active-active-02

Abstract:
   Draft [TRILL-Active-PS] lists basic problems which any active-active
   solutions should address, these problems include frame duplications,
   loop, MAC address flip-flop and unsynchronized information among
   member RBridges. For each problem, there may be multiple ways to
   deal with it. Some solutions solve all or most of the problems
   listed, and at the same time introduces extra issues. This draft
   tries to analyze and compare the different solutions for each of the
   issues, gives a brief summary on the pros and cons, and/or the
   applicable scenarios.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat