Subject: [Tsvwg] RE: The mail we discussed

From: "Francois Le Faucheur \(flefauch\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:42:07 +0200

Hello Aaron,

As per TSVWG final minutes (available from
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05aug/index.html)

"
Allison declares enough support to go ahead.  The requirement will
be a least a couple of RSVP reviewers (from the RSVP team) to
write during WGLC.
"

So I believe the agreement was that the "RSVP team" members review would
happen during the WGLC.

Thanks

Francois

PS: For one of my other documents (draft-lefaucheur-rsvp-ipsec-01.txt)
there was indeed a sort of "prerequisite" that some security experts
review the doc before the WG can moce too far with that document.
Perhaps this is where the confusion comes from.

________________________________

	From: Aaron Falk <[email-masked]> 

		Date: October 13, 2005 12:06:45 AM EDT 
		To: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)"
<[email-masked]>, Allison Mankin <[email-masked]>, "Peterson, Jon"
<[email-masked]> 
		Cc: [email-masked], Davenport Michael
<[email-masked]>, [email-masked], Christou Chris
<[email-masked]> 
		Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] WG Last Call on
draft-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-00.txt 
		
		Francois- 

		My (admittedly vague) recollection is that the expert
writeup was a pre-requisite to WGLC, not part of WGLC. 

		--aaron 

		--On October 12, 2005 5:04:18 PM +0200 "Francois Le
Faucheur (flefauch)" <[email-masked]> wrote: 

			Hello Allison, Jon, 

			I understand the decision at last meeting was to
issue a WG Last Call on 
			<draft-tsvwg-rsvp-dste-00.tx> and make sure
that, as part of the WGLC, 
			at least a couple of "RSVP Team" members write
up their reviews. 

			Could we go ahead with the LC? 

			Could you help identify who from the "RSVP Team"
can commit to written 
			reviews? 

			That way we could work face to face in Vancouver
to close potential 
			comments/issues from the review. 

			Thank you 

			Francois 

			=================================== 

				From draft minutes: 

			" 

					Allison said that she is willing
to have a WGLC, but the WG 
					needs to have written reviews
from the people that call 
					themselves the "RSVP team". 
					Any objections? No one voiced
objections. 

					Allson called for a hum: People
supporting wglc at this time? 
					There was moderate support
Allison declares enough support 
					to go ahead. The requirement
will 
					be a least a couple of RSVP
reviewers (from the RSVP team) 
					to write during WGLC. 

			" 

			_______________________________________________ 
			tsvwg mailing list 
			[email-masked] 
			https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg 

		_______________________________________________ 
		tsvwg mailing list 
		[email-masked] 
		https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg 

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg