Subject: Re: draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt

From: Rémi Després <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:18:09 +0100

Oops! Point 3 below is just an unfortunate mistake.
Thanks for ingnoring it.
My apologies to authors and to the group.

Points 1 and 2 on the other hand relmain valid in my view.

Rémi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rémi Després" <[email-masked]>
To: "Margaret Wasserman" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "v6ops" <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt

> Hi,
>
>
> Three points:
>
> 1. Teredo Client definition
>   The current definition "A node that has some access to the IPv4 Internet
> and wants to gain access to the IPv6 Internet" is IMHO much too large.
>   It could advantageously be become something like:
>   "A node that has some access to the IPv4 Internet via an IPv4-only node
> where NAT is operational, and that wants to gain access to the IPv6
> Internet"
>
>  2. NAT definition
>   The document neither includes a definition of NATs, nor refers to a
> document which does it.
>   It would help if the scope of NATs considered in the document would be
> concisely delimited, e.g. with a definition like:  "NATs referred to in
this
> document are IPv4-only mechanisms which, at least for some restricted
> applications, provide access to the IPv4 global address space from some
IPv4
> private address spaces. They use for this stateful translation of
addresses
> and possibly of port numbers ."
>
>  3. Page numbers.
>   In the table of contents page numbers exceed by 1 the appropriate
values.
> Fixing it would improve the document.
>
> Rémi
> (These points were made in a mail already answered by Eric Klein but, sent
> from an unregistered address, didn't appear in  the mailin list.)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Margaret Wasserman" <[email-masked]>
> To: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
> <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
> <[email-masked]>; "Jonathan Rosenberg"
> <[email-masked]>
> Cc: <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 4:47 PM
> Subject: draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt
>
>
> >
> > Hi Eric, Henrik, Karen, Francis, Markku and Jonathan,
> >
> > There is a new version of the Teredo draft available at:
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt
> >
> > Could you check whether this version addresses the issues that you
> > raised during IETF LC?  It would be best if you could review this
> > document and return any feedback by this Thursday, 9-Dec-04.
> >
> > If there are no further objections, I will place this draft on the
> > IESG agenda for consideration on our 16-Dec-04 telechat.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Margaret
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>