Subject: comments on draft-rgaglian-v6ops-v6inixp-01

From: MAWATARI Masataka <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:12:05 +0900

Greetings,

a couple of comments on the v6inixp-01.

   - Introduction
      - algthouh is typo?
        (Apologies in advance if this is already commented.)

   - Addressing Plan section
      - 240.0.20.132 should not be using on like this draft.
      - You should use TEST-NET address (192.0.2.0/24).

   - Reverse DNS section
      - What is the reason all IX participants' address should be
        assigned PTR record.
      - I don't think PTR record is not always necessary, if there are
        accepted practice that IX participant's ASN is inside each IPv6
        address.
      - Any recommendation should not be mentioned without a good
        course.

Best Regards,
Masataka MAWATARI from JPIX