Subject: IPv6 Operations - IETF 78

From: Fred Baker <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:28:59 -0400

Checking: is this the right agenda? Any issues?
IPv6 Operations - IETF 78

Monday 13:00-14:59

Agenda bashing
 
Mobile Networks Considerations for IPv6 Deployment
12-Jul-10, <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-in-mobile-networks-01.txt>
CIDR for IPv6: Address Aggregation
29-Jun-10, <draft-azinger-cidrv6-00.txt>
Advanced Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
8-Jul-10, <draft-wbeebee-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-03.txt>
BBF Liaison Discussion
https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/922/
Friday 13:00-14:59

Flexible DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in Mobile Networks
10-May-10, <draft-sarikaya-v6ops-prefix-delegation-01.txt>
Security Concerns With IP Tunneling
8-Mar-10, <draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-02.txt>
Routing Loop Attack using IPv6 Automatic Tunnels: Problem Statement and Proposed Mitigations
12-May-10, <draft-nakibly-v6ops-tunnel-loops-02.txt>
An Incremental Carrier-Grade NAT (CGN) for IPv6 Transition
18-Jun-10, <draft-ietf-v6ops-incremental-cgn-01.txt>

---

From: Seiichi Kawamura <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:00:03 +0900

I requested a slot for at Maastricht
a while back for draft-kawamura-ipv6-isp-listings-00
(forgot to Cc list)

Is v6ops a suitable place to discuss and get input?

Regards,
Seiichi

---

From: Fred Baker <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:25:48 -0400

Sorry, thanks.

On Jul 14, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Seiichi Kawamura wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAkw+T4MACgkQcrhTYfxyMkJOwACfSb0kaVE1EncEOnOIH5w3n6ha
> +qYAnivvI69MJqmR6DxCOTezwwMJ9b6G
> =DUmV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF