Subject: Re: [v6ops] Next step of DHCP/SLAAC problem

From: Jared Mauch <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:45:10 -0400

Does someone know who to report this python error to:?

check out:

http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.pdf

- Jared

On Jun 18, 2014, at 5:18 AM, Liubing (Leo) <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Currently we have 2 v6ops documents regarding with the DHCPv6/SLAAC interaction problem:
> Problem Statement:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
> Operational Guidelines:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance-01
> 
> The Problem Statement document has been adopted by the WG (we just uploaded a new version, details to see the other mail), and the Operational Guidelines document was discussed in last ietf meeting in London.
> According to the discussion, it seemed people were not clear about whether we need a separate operational guidelines document or not. 
> 
> So let me enumerate possible next steps of the topic to see which you prefer:
> 1. Move forward the PS document to be published, and possibly adopt the Operational Guidelines document as well (Of course the draft needs further revision and discussion).
> 2. Integrate the operations guidelines into the PS draft, and move forward it to be published
> 3. Move forward the PS document, and drop the operational guidelines document.
> 
> Looking forward to your opinions.
> Many thanks!
> 
> Best regards,
> Bing
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops