Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat

From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:03:28 +0000

We agreed to take draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc as a working group draft; it is now posted as draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc. I’m not clear on draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat; Tore has done the work to post it as draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat, but I don’t know the collected opinion. Do we want it (and do we want draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-eam) as working group drafts?