Subject: AW: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based Web Services approachforXCON

From: "Leis, Peter" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:55:18 +0100

hello,

3GPP does _NOT_ refer to CPCP as "conference policy control protocol" in its specs for conferencing in Rel-6.
Even in Rel-7 the protocol to use for conferenc policy control is for further study.

regards
Peter

________________________________

	Von: Oscar Novo (JO/LMF) [mailto:[email-masked]] 
	Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 12:08
	An: Orit Levin; XCON-IETF
	Betreff: RE: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based Web Services approachforXCON

	Hi Orit,
	 
	If you take a look the one year old 3GPP specifications, you can see most of them defined the CPCP protocol as the "conference control protocol" for XCON. If Parley X 2.0 /ETSI is using SOAP in their specifications is not enough reason (at least for me ) to discard the other proposals. 
		
	Oscar
	 
________________________________

	From: Orit Levin [mailto:[email-masked]] 
	Sent: 9. maaliskuuta 2006 3:48
	To: XCON-IETF
	Subject: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based Web Services approach forXCON

	Guys,

	Take a look at the list of Web Services being defined already by Parley X 2.0  /ETSI jointly with 3GPP...

	http://www.parlay.org/en/specifications/ 

	Take a look at "Part 12" specifically,

	Orit.

_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon