Subject: AW: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based Web ServicesapproachforXCON

From: "Leis, Peter" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 14:00:57 +0100

hello Oscar,

CPCP was part of the early versions of 3GPP TS 24.147 in Release-6. However, due to its immaturity CPCP was scratched from Release 6 in November 2004 when Release 6 was frozen.

For Rel-7 the situation with regards to CPCP has not changed, it is not part of TS 24.147.

regards
Peter

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Oscar Novo (JO/LMF) [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 13:52
> An: Leis, Peter
> Betreff: RE: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based Web 
> ServicesapproachforXCON
> 
> Hello Peter,
> 
> I am not an expert in 3GPP but just as an example:
> 
> TS 24.147 document, section "A.3.6 Conference creation with 
> CPCP" date 2004-09 (Release 6). 
> 
> This documentation is referring to 
> draft-ietf-xcon-cpcp-xcap-00 one of the protocols proposed in 
> the past by XCON. 
> 
> That's true in Rel-7 it doesn't appear because they decided 
> to remove it from the specifications. 
> 
> O.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leis, Peter [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: 9. maaliskuuta 2006 13:55
> To: XCON-IETF
> Subject: AW: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based Web 
> ServicesapproachforXCON
> 
>  hello,
> 
> 3GPP does _NOT_ refer to CPCP as "conference policy control 
> protocol" in its specs for conferencing in Rel-6.
> Even in Rel-7 the protocol to use for conferenc policy 
> control is for further study.
> 
> regards
> Peter
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	Von: Oscar Novo (JO/LMF) [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> 	Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2006 12:08
> 	An: Orit Levin; XCON-IETF
> 	Betreff: RE: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based 
> Web Services approachforXCON
> 	
> 	
> 	Hi Orit,
> 	 
> 	If you take a look the one year old 3GPP 
> specifications, you can see most of them defined the CPCP 
> protocol as the "conference control protocol" for XCON. If 
> Parley X 2.0 /ETSI is using SOAP in their specifications is 
> not enough reason (at least for me ) to discard the other proposals. 
> 		
> 	Oscar
> 	 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: Orit Levin [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> 	Sent: 9. maaliskuuta 2006 3:48
> 	To: XCON-IETF
> 	Subject: [XCON] A killing argument for SOAP-based Web 
> Services approach forXCON
> 	
> 	
> 
> 	Guys,
> 
> 	Take a look at the list of Web Services being defined 
> already by Parley X 2.0  /ETSI jointly with 3GPP...
> 
> 	http://www.parlay.org/en/specifications/ 
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	Take a look at "Part 12" specifically,
> 
> 	Orit.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> XCON mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
> 

_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon