Last updated on 2025-01-09 01:50:01 CET.
Flavor | Version | Tinstall | Tcheck | Ttotal | Status | Flags |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang | 1.2.1 | NOTE | ||||
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc | 1.2.1 | 8.86 | 71.78 | 80.64 | NOTE | |
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang | 1.2.1 | 244.19 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc | 1.2.1 | 221.96 | NOTE | |||
r-devel-windows-x86_64 | 1.2.1 | 14.00 | 139.00 | 153.00 | NOTE | |
r-patched-linux-x86_64 | 1.2.1 | 19.85 | 114.85 | 134.70 | NOTE | |
r-release-linux-x86_64 | 1.2.1 | 14.28 | 113.01 | 127.29 | NOTE | |
r-release-macos-arm64 | 1.2.1 | 55.00 | NOTE | |||
r-release-macos-x86_64 | 1.2.1 | 84.00 | NOTE | |||
r-release-windows-x86_64 | 1.2.1 | 14.00 | 135.00 | 149.00 | NOTE | |
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 | 1.2.1 | 63.00 | OK | |||
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 | 1.2.1 | 105.00 | OK | |||
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 | 1.2.1 | 19.00 | 169.00 | 188.00 | OK |
Version: 1.2.1
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE
checkRd: (-1) glm.cons.Rd:54: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup?
54 | \item{method}{the method used in fitting the model. The default method "\code{glm.fit.cons}" uses function {nnnpls} from package nnls instead of \code{lm.fit} to impose the sign of the coefficients. As in \code{glm}, the alternative method "\code{model.frame}" returns the model frame and does no fitting.}
| ^
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64
Version: 1.2.1
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE
Found the following Rd file(s) with Rd \link{} targets missing package
anchors:
glm.cons.Rd: glm2
glm.fit.cons.Rd: glm.fit2
Please provide package anchors for all Rd \link{} targets not in the
package itself and the base packages.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64