Subject: Re: [6lo] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-13: (with COMMENT)

From: 최영환 <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 01:36:03 +0000

Hello Spencer and all,

Thanks for your valuable reviews.
Please find my answers inline.

BRs,
Younghwan Choi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:30 AM
> To: The IESG <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]; Carles Gomez <[email-masked]>;
> Samita Chakrabarti <[email-masked]>; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-13: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-nfc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I support Alissa's second Discuss point about the plan for fragmentation
> interoperation, and her third Discuss point about connecting unsuspecting
> devices to the Internet :-)

Agreed. I also gave the answers for the same as Benjamin's DISCUSS and Alissa' DISCUSS. IPv6-over-NFC is restricted to NFC devices that support MUIX in the final draft. Please refer to the answers about Benjamin's DISCUSS.

> 
> Other people have said this, but requiring MIUX would be awesome.
>