Subject: [AAA-DOCTORS] Criteria for Errata

From: Mark Jones <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:29:25 -0400

Hi Doctors,

The *-Application-Id AVP error in RFC3588 (AVP MUST be present in every command) is being propagated into new Diameter applications. This error caused significant confusion in 3GPP and will probably cause confusion in WiMAX. 

Looking at the IESG review guideline, I was wondering whether an Errata to RFC3588 would be approved for this bug (even though it is fixed in 3588bis). 

I don't want to waste time writing up Errata that will simply be classed as "Hold for Document Update" in 3588bis. 

How long does the Errata approval process take? Is it better to wait for 3588bis?

Thanks
Mark