Subject: [aqm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-02.txt

From: David Ros <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:50:41 +0200

Dear all,

We've posted an update of draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines. It's a minor update:

- a couple of nits fixed,
- title changed from "evaluation guidelines" to "characterisation guidelines" as suggested by Fred Baker,
- tries to separate more clearly AQM from scheduling,
- changes on the ECN-related text (it now points to draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation).

Feedback welcome.

Thanks,

David

Begin forwarded message:

> From: [email-masked]
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-02.txt
> Date: 11 Aug 2014 11:33:58 GMT+2
> To: Nicolas Kuhn <[email-masked]>, "David Ros" <[email-masked]>, David Ros <[email-masked]>, "Preethi Natarajan" <[email-masked]>, "Naeem Khademi" <[email-masked]>, "Nicolas Kuhn" <[email-masked]>, Preethi Natarajan <[email-masked]>, Naeem Khademi <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by David Ros and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines
> Revision:	02
> Title:		AQM Characterization Guidelines
> Document date:	2014-08-11
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		23
> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-02.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-02
> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kuhn-aqm-eval-guidelines-02
> 
> Abstract:
>   Unmanaged large buffers in today's networks have given rise to a slew
>   of performance issues.  These performance issues can be addressed by
>   some form of Active Queue Management (AQM), optionally in combination
>   with a packet scheduling scheme such as fair queuing.  The IETF AQM
>   and packet scheduling working group was formed to standardize AQM
>   schemes that are robust, easily implemented, and successfully
>   deployed in today's networks.  This document describes various
>   criteria for performing precautionary characterizations of AQM
>   proposals.  This document also helps in ascertaining whether any
>   given AQM proposal should be taken up for standardization by the AQM
>   WG.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
>