Subject: RE: 54th IETF AToMMIB meeting minutes and presentation slides

From: "Faye Ly" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 18:35:48 -0700

Yes, we all in agreement here.  But we will first
find out this is indeed something people are
interested in managing the optical interface ...

-faye

>From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email-masked]>
>To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>,   Faye Ly 
><[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
>Subject: RE: 54th IETF AToMMIB meeting minutes and presentation slides
>Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:31:49 +0200
>
>Thanks Dan for pointing out that the sensor MIB indeed
>is intended to cover this. What this means (in my view) is that
>the atommib WG chairs need to make sure that we do not
>get duplicate (or overlapping) objects in specific MIBs,
>but that instead a proper reference is made to a more generic
>MIB that covers this. One could make a COMPLIANCE requirement
>that specified that a object group of the sensor MIB must
>be implemented.
>
>Bert
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > Sent: maandag 29 juli 2002 22:32
> > To: Faye Ly; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> > Subject: RE: 54th IETF AToMMIB meeting minutes and presentation slides
> >
> >
> > I am not sure who needs to look at this, but this is the
> > intention of the Entity Sensor MIB - avoid repeating
> > definition of objects with sensor physical entities sensor
> > semantics in different MIB modules. There is nothing ATM or
> > DWDM specific in monitoring output power or laser temperature.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Faye Ly [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:03 PM
> > > To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> > > Subject: RE: 54th IETF AToMMIB meeting minutes and
> > presentation slides
> > >
> > >
> > > Bert,
> > >
> > > I don't believe we have looked at the Sensor
> > > MIB close enough to say.  But that is the
> > > intention ...
> > >
> > > -faye
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email-masked]>
> > > >To: [email-masked]
> > > >Subject: RE: 54th IETF AToMMIB meeting minutes and
> > > presentation slides
> > > >Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 13:16:34 +0200
> > > >
> > > >From the minutes:
> > > > > 2.	Kam presented Optical Interface mib
> > > > >
> > > > > -	monitors input, output power, and laser temperature on
> > > > > both source and transmit directions.  Bring this to the
> > > > > list for any other DWDM vendor is supporting this.
> > > > > If yes, incorporate Rish's suggestion.  If not, suggest to
> > > > > Rish to use the Sensor MIB done in the Entity MIB.  Sensor
> > > > > MIB can be used to model any measurement including power
> > > > > or temperature in either directions.
> > > > >
> > > >Just to be sure I understand this correctly, this suggests
> > > >potentially using the sensor MIB as is (as per draft
> > > >draft-ietf-entmib-sensor-mib-00.txt), because this is on
> > > >my (AD) agenda for IESG considerations for PS.
> > > >
> > > >Bert
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device:
>http://mobile.msn.com
> >
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com