Subject: [AVT] Re: G726 packing specified in draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-12.txt

From: "Eli Shoval" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:58:27 +0200

Stephen, Rajesh,

I am sending this as a response to the recent request to change the G.726 packetization in ietf avt profile.
We at Audiocodes implemented the G.726 packetization according to ietf avt profile.
We object to removing the original G.726 packetization from this standard because it will cause us to change our implementation.

Why can't the ITU I366.2 packetization be added as additional vocoder to the ietf avt using dynamic payload type ?
In this case if it will have MIME registration with a different name than the regular G726 and if both gateways support it they will be able to communicate.

Eli Shoval
Audiocodes.

************************************************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential material.
They are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify [email-masked]
and permanently delete the e-mail and files.
***********************************************************************************************************