Subject: [AVT] Re: Document Action: 'BT's eXtended Network Quality RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR XNQ)' to Informational RFC

From: Colin Perkins <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:42:19 +0100

On 15 Oct 2007, at 15:51, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has approved the following document:
>
> - 'BT's eXtended Network Quality RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports
>    (RTCP XR XNQ) '
>    <draft-hunt-avt-rtcpxnq-01.txt> as an Informational RFC
>
> This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product  
> of an
> IETF Working Group.
>
> The IESG contact person is Cullen Jennings.
...
> IESG Note
>
>  The IESG has concerns about vendor code points
>  allocation in this small namespace and might
>  not approve similar documents in the future.

Can the IESG explain the reasoning behind this note? It appears there  
is some concern about the size of the namespace, but - since the  
namespace is managed according to a specification required (not RFC  
required) policy - withholding approval of similar documents won't  
help there.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt