Subject: Re: [AVT] draft-gmassey-avt-rtp-aptx-01.txt

From: Colin Perkins <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 15:22:19 +0100

Hi Greg,

On 23 Apr 2008, at 11:23, Greg Massey wrote:
...
>> Does it make sense to mandate that ancillary data MUST NOT be used  
>> for synchronisation when apt-X is carried over RTP, with  
>> applications using the standard RTP mechanisms instead?
>
> It does not matter to the codec if it is enabled or not as the  
> codec will carry on decoding irrespective.

So the ancillary data could be stripped when used with RTP?

>>> In terms of IPR would this have to included details of the  
>>> algorithm itself, or is it acceptable that anyone using the draft  
>>> would usually be a licensee of the algorithm?
>>
>> We're concerned about IPR on the RTP payload format draft, rather
>> than IPR on the codec itself.
>
> There is no IPR in the payload format that I am aware of.

Okay, thanks.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt