Subject: [BEHAVE] Re: [Ietf-behave] IPv6 extension draft

From: "Alfred E. Heggestad" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:07:56 +0100

Hi

is there any chance of having the REQUESTED-ADDRESS-TYPE attribute as part
of the main TURN specification? I don't understand why a new draft is needed
just for one additional attribute..

/alfred

Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> given that we do not need to discuss this draft in San Diego, we did not
> revise it for the meeting. However, we did not notice in time that the
> previous revision (00) has expired. We will be submitting a new revision
> (01) right after San Diego.
> 
> In any case, we have posted a working copy of the draft at:
> http://users.piuha.net/gonzalo/temp/draft-ietf-behave-turn-ipv6-01.txt
> 
> There are no known open issues. We are just keeping it aligned to the
> STUN and STUN relay usage specs.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-behave mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-behave

_______________________________________________
Behave mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave