Subject: [bmwg] an iesg comment on draft-ietf-ipfix-reqs-09.txt

From: Randy Bush <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:33:40 -0800

4.2(4) What about link-layer distinguisher of IP version?

4.3 What about SCTP?

4.4, 4.5, and others:  This document can't say "If the observation point is
located at a foo".  At most, it can say "a foo-capable box MUST" or "a 
box SHOULD do such-and-such so that it can be located at a foo".

4.6 strikes me as dubious for compression.

What about the IPv6 Flow Label as a flow separator?

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg