Subject: RE: Can we keep it civil? (was: Re: [Capwap] Comments on draft-ietf-capwap-arch-03.txt)

From: "Pat R. Calhoun" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:30:47 -0700

Therefore, as an attempt at concensus, I'd suggest modifying the statement
to say something like the following:

    The exact balance of centralized v.s. decentralized state and its impact
    on managability for CAPWAP architectures such as Split  MAC and
    Remote MAC is currently a matter of dispute
    within the technical community.

<PRC> Well, my preferred approach is to kill the text, but I am willing to live
with this proposed text instead.

PatC