Subject: [Capwap] RE: Capwap digest, Vol 1 #610 - 13 msgs

From: "Sthiti Ranjan Sarangi" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:22:17 -0700

Hi,

Yes: LWAPP should be the basis for CAPWAP

Thanks n Regards
Sthiti

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked]
[mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
[email-masked]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 11:43 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Capwap digest, Vol 1 #610 - 13 msgs

Send Capwap mailing list submissions to
	[email-masked]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	[email-masked]

You can reach the person managing the list at
	[email-masked]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Capwap digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. RE: Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol (Susan
Hares)
   2. FW: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol
(Youval Nachum)
   3. RE: [Capwap} Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol
([email-masked])
   4. Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol (Thao Tran
(tptran))
   5. No, LWAPP should bot be the basis for CAPWAP protocol (Tan Pek
Yew)
   6. Re: Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol (Kevin
Hayes)
   7. Re: Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol (Kevin
Hayes)
   8. Re: Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
       protocol (Henry Ptasinski)
   9. Re: Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol (Jean-Luc
Ronarch)
  10. RE: Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol
(Inderpreet Singh)
  11. Re: Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol
(Pradeepkumar Jayakar)
  12. Logical Group Recommendation R7 (Richard Gwee)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Subject: RE: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
protocol
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:09:40 -0700
From: "Susan Hares" <[email-masked]>
To: "Nafea Bshara" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>,
	"Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <[email-masked]>

Yes: LWAPP should be the basis for CAPWAP.

Sue

=3D
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
Behalf
> >Of [email-masked]
> >Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:13 PM
> >To: [email-masked]
> >Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> >[email-masked]
> >Subject: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol
> >
> >
> >After many weeks of discussion on the CAPWAP evaluation draft
completed by
> >the eval team its time to poll the WG on the protocol consensus.  The
> >evaluation team concluded that LWAPP is the most complete proposal
and
> >should be used as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol going forward.
> >
> >Please respond to this email indicating support for LWAPP as the new
CAPWAP
> >protocol:
> >	YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol or,
> >	 NO:   LWAPP should not be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol.
> >
> >The evaluation has also raised a number of recommendation that should
be
> >address by the WG on top of the protocol recommendation.   These will
be
> >addressed by the WG and applied to the protocol that achieves WG
consensus.
> >In order to progress the work, we are separating the Evaluation's
team
> >proposal so that we agree first on the protcol, and then evaluate
each
> >recommendation separately.
> >
> >Please submit your response to this protocol poll by Friday, November
> >4th.   We will discuss the results of the poll at the face to face
> >CAPWAP WG meeting on Monday, November 7th.
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Dorothy and Mani
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Capwap mailing list
> >[email-masked]
> >http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Capwap mailing list
> >[email-masked]
> >http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Capwap mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

--__--__--

Message: 2
Subject: FW: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
protocol
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:33:54 +0200
From: "Youval Nachum" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>

YES:   LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol
Thanks
UV

-----Original Message-----
From: "Sood, Kapil"<[email-masked]>
Sent: 11/6/2005 8:23:14 PM
To: "[email-masked]"<[email-masked]>,
"[email-masked]"<[email-masked]>,
"[email-masked]"<[email-masked]>,
"[email-masked]"<[email-masked]>,
"[email-masked]"<[email-masked]>
Cc:=20
Subject: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol

YES:   LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol

Best Regards,
=20
Kapil.
503.264.3759

> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
Behalf
> >Of [email-masked]
> >Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 8:13 PM
> >To: [email-masked]
> >Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];=20
> >[email-masked]
> >Subject: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol
> >
> >
> >After many weeks of discussion on the CAPWAP evaluation draft
completed by
> >the eval team its time to poll the WG on the protocol consensus.  The

> >evaluation team concluded that LWAPP is the most complete proposal
and
> >should be used as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol going forward.
> >
> >Please respond to this email indicating support for LWAPP as the new
CAPWAP
> >protocol:
> >	YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol or,
> >	 NO:   LWAPP should not be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol.
> >
> >The evaluation has also raised a number of recommendation that should
be
> >address by the WG on top of the protocol recommendation.   These will
be
> >addressed by the WG and applied to the protocol that achieves WG
consensus.
> >In order to progress the work, we are separating the Evaluation's
team
> >proposal so that we agree first on the protcol, and then evaluate
each
> >recommendation separately.
> >
> >Please submit your response to this protocol poll by Friday, November
> >4th.   We will discuss the results of the poll at the face to face
> >CAPWAP WG meeting on Monday, November 7th.
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Dorothy and Mani
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Capwap mailing list
> >[email-masked]
> >http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Capwap mailing list
> >[email-masked]
> >http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Capwap mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

--__--__--

Message: 3
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:21:13 +0000
Subject: [Capwap] RE: [Capwap} Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the
CAPWAP protocol

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14762_1131398473_0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

YES: LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14762_1131398473_0
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html><body>
<DIV>YES: LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP
protocol</DIV></body></html>

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_14762_1131398473_0--

--__--__--

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:08:52 -0800
From: "Thao Tran (tptran)" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5E4A0.9AB5A20C
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol

Thao Tran

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5E4A0.9AB5A20C
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7233.8">
<TITLE>Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->

<P ALIGN=3DLEFT><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">YES:&nbsp; LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP =
protocol</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN></P>
<BR>

<P ALIGN=3DLEFT><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Thao
=
Tran</FONT></SPAN></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5E4A0.9AB5A20C--

--__--__--

Message: 5
Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
From: "Tan Pek Yew" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:22:10 +0800
Organization: Panasonic Singapore Laboratories
Subject: [Capwap] No, LWAPP should bot be the basis for CAPWAP protocol

No, LWAPP should not be the basis for CAPWAP protocol.

CAPWAP should be an robust protocol having the best features extracted
from the
4 protocol proposal submitted thus far.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Tim 
> Olson (tolson)
> Sent: 05 November 2005 06:52
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; 
> [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the 
> CAPWAP protocol
> 
> Yes, LWAPP should be the basis for the CAPWAP protocol
> 
> 

--__--__--

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:40:11 -0800
From: Kevin Hayes <[email-masked]>
Organization: Atheros Communications
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
protocol

Yes.
LWAPP should be the basis for the CAPWAP protocol.

    K++

-- 
Kevin Hayes
Atheros Communications Inc.
408-773-5275

--__--__--

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:35:27 -0800
From: Kevin Hayes <[email-masked]>
Organization: Atheros Communications
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
protocol

Yes.
LWAPP should be the basis for the CAPWAP protocol.

   K++

-- 
Kevin Hayes
Atheros Communications Inc.
408-773-5275

--__--__--

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:33:30 -0800
From: "Henry Ptasinski" <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
 protocol

YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol

On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:12:57PM -0700, [email-masked]
wrote:
> 
> After many weeks of discussion on the CAPWAP evaluation draft
completed
> by the eval team its time to poll the WG on the protocol consensus.
The
> evaluation team concluded that LWAPP is the most complete proposal and
> should be used as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol going forward.
> 
> Please respond to this email indicating support for LWAPP as the new
> CAPWAP protocol: 
> 	YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol or,
> 	 NO:   LWAPP should not be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol.
> 
> The evaluation has also raised a number of recommendation that should
be
> address by the WG on top of the protocol recommendation.   These will
be
> addressed by the WG and applied to the protocol that achieves WG
> consensus.  In order to progress the work, we are separating the
> Evaluation's team proposal so that we agree first on the protcol, and
> then evaluate each recommendation separately.  
> 
> Please submit your response to this protocol poll by Friday, November
> 4th.   We will discuss the results of the poll at the face to face
> CAPWAP WG meeting on Monday, November 7th.  
> 
> Best Regards,
> Dorothy and Mani
> 
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Capwap mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

-- 
Henry Ptasinski				+1-408-543-3316
Broadcom Home And Wireless Networking	[email-masked]

--__--__--

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:37:11 -0800
From: Jean-Luc Ronarch <[email-masked]>
Organization: Alcatel
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
protocol

NO:   LWAPP should not be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol.

[email-masked] wrote:

>After many weeks of discussion on the CAPWAP evaluation draft completed
>by the eval team its time to poll the WG on the protocol consensus.
The
>evaluation team concluded that LWAPP is the most complete proposal and
>should be used as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol going forward.
>
>Please respond to this email indicating support for LWAPP as the new
>CAPWAP protocol: 
>	YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol or,
>	 NO:   LWAPP should not be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol.
>
>The evaluation has also raised a number of recommendation that should
be
>address by the WG on top of the protocol recommendation.   These will
be
>addressed by the WG and applied to the protocol that achieves WG
>consensus.  In order to progress the work, we are separating the
>Evaluation's team proposal so that we agree first on the protcol, and
>then evaluate each recommendation separately.  
>
>Please submit your response to this protocol poll by Friday, November
>4th.   We will discuss the results of the poll at the face to face
>CAPWAP WG meeting on Monday, November 7th.  
>
>Best Regards,
>Dorothy and Mani
>
>
>
> 
>_______________________________________________
>Capwap mailing list
>[email-masked]
>http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
>
>  
>

--__--__--

Message: 10
From: Inderpreet Singh <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Subject: RE: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
protocol
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 23:06:36 -0500 

YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol

---
Inderpreet Singh
 
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:12:57PM -0700, [email-masked]
wrote:
> 
> After many weeks of discussion on the CAPWAP evaluation draft
completed
> by the eval team its time to poll the WG on the protocol consensus.
The
> evaluation team concluded that LWAPP is the most complete proposal and
> should be used as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol going forward.
> 
> Please respond to this email indicating support for LWAPP as the new
> CAPWAP protocol: 
> 	YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol or,
> 	 NO:   LWAPP should not be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol.
> 
> The evaluation has also raised a number of recommendation that should
be
> address by the WG on top of the protocol recommendation.   These will
be
> addressed by the WG and applied to the protocol that achieves WG
> consensus.  In order to progress the work, we are separating the
> Evaluation's team proposal so that we agree first on the protcol, and
> then evaluate each recommendation separately.  
> 
> Please submit your response to this protocol poll by Friday, November
> 4th.   We will discuss the results of the poll at the face to face
> CAPWAP WG meeting on Monday, November 7th.  
> 
> Best Regards,
> Dorothy and Mani
> 
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Capwap mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

-- 
Henry Ptasinski				+1-408-543-3316
Broadcom Home And Wireless Networking	[email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

--__--__--

Message: 11
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:56:16 +0530
From: Pradeepkumar Jayakar <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP
protocol
To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Organization: Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore

YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>;
<[email-masked]>
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 5:42 AM
Subject: [Capwap] Poll for LWAPP as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol

After many weeks of discussion on the CAPWAP evaluation draft completed
by the eval team its time to poll the WG on the protocol consensus.  The
evaluation team concluded that LWAPP is the most complete proposal and
should be used as the basis for the CAPWAP protocol going forward.

Please respond to this email indicating support for LWAPP as the new
CAPWAP protocol:
YES:  LWAPP should be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol or,
NO:   LWAPP should not be the basis of the CAPWAP protocol.

The evaluation has also raised a number of recommendation that should be
address by the WG on top of the protocol recommendation.   These will be
addressed by the WG and applied to the protocol that achieves WG
consensus.  In order to progress the work, we are separating the
Evaluation's team proposal so that we agree first on the protcol, and
then evaluate each recommendation separately.

Please submit your response to this protocol poll by Friday, November
4th.   We will discuss the results of the poll at the face to face
CAPWAP WG meeting on Monday, November 7th.

Best Regards,
Dorothy and Mani

_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

--__--__--

Message: 12
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:12:51 +0800
From: "Richard Gwee" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Capwap] Logical Group Recommendation R7

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5E5BD.C898BB2F
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID:
72B323A8-7BD6-4D83-8085-EB630DF3B37D
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

=20

During the CAPWAP meeting session, it was unfortunate that I was not
given enough time for my presentation. As such, I will like to highlight
some of my concerns via this mailing list. I understand that we have to
move forward quickly and close all the outstanding issues as many as
possible. My presentation slides "CAPWAP Comparative Analysis" has
covered many of the topics discussed in the session on Monday. However,
I felt that there is one area that has not been really discussed within
our working group and that is the default mode for logical groups as
listed as R7 in the list.

=20

It is important that the final CAPWAP protocol should have a default
mode for logical grouping for both wired and wireless aspects of the
network. The basic case of mapping VLANs to BSSIDs is the simplest and
most common way of doing this. Logical group configuration must cover
setup on both these two aspects and include a link between them.=20

=20

I noticed that the status is put as "closed?" although I am not sure
what does this really imply. I think for a start, we can try to finalize
some of these issues first. Appreciate any comments and feedback.

=20

Thanks and regards

Richard Gwee

Republic Polytechnic, Tanglin Campus, 1 Kay Siang Road, Singapore 248922
=
. Website: www.rp.sg . Fax: +65 6415-1310 .

From April 2006, we will be located in our new home at 9 Woodlands =
Avenue 9,Singapore 738964=20
Republic Polytechnic, the first Institute of Higher Learning to fully =
adopt the Problem-Based Learning approach in Singapore, continues to =
strive towards best practices and maintain excellence in service =
standards with the following certifications: Singapore Quality Class =
(SQC) certification, People Developer Standards and QEHS standards (ISO
=
9001, 14001 and OHSAS 18001 certifications).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION: This message is intended only for the use of =
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and contains =
information that is privileged and confidential. If you, the reader of =
this message, are not the intended recipient, you should not =
disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received
=
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return =
email and delete the original message. Thank you.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5E5BD.C898BB2F
X-EC0D2A8E-5CB7-4969-9C36-46D859D137BE-PartID:
948F9453-5518-4E93-9069-5AE22E0DB1BA
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:Arial;
	color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Hi,</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>During the CAPWAP meeting session, it was unfortunate
=
that I
was not given enough time for my presentation. As such, I will like to
highlight some of my concerns via this mailing list. I understand that =
we have
to move forward quickly and close all the outstanding issues as many as
possible. My presentation slides &#8220;CAPWAP Comparative =
Analysis&#8221; has
covered many of the topics discussed in the session on Monday. However,
=
I felt
that there is one area that has not been really discussed within our =
working
group and that is the default mode for logical groups as listed as R7 in
=
the
list.</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>It is important that the final CAPWAP protocol should
=
have a
default mode for logical grouping for both wired and wireless aspects of
=
the
network. The basic case of mapping VLANs to BSSIDs is the simplest and =
most
common way of doing this. Logical group configuration must cover setup =
on both
these two aspects and include a link between them. </span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>I noticed that the status is put as =
&#8220;closed?&#8221; although
I am not sure what does this really imply. I think for a start, we can =
try to
finalize some of these issues first. Appreciate any comments and =
feedback.</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Thanks and regards</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Richard Gwee</span></font></p>

</div>

</body>

<!--[object_id=3D#rp.sg#]--><P align=3Dcenter><FONT face=3DTahoma =
size=3D2><FONT color=3D#0000ff><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" =
color=3D#000000 size=3D3>
<HR>
</P></FONT>
<P align=3Dcenter>
<TABLE width=3D"100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width=3D"100%">
<P align=3Dcenter><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2>Republic Polytechnic, =
Tanglin Campus, 1 Kay Siang Road, Singapore 248922<BR>. </FONT><A =
title=3Dhttp://www.rp.edu.sg/ href=3D"http://www.rp.sg"><FONT =
title=3Dhttp://www.rp.edu.sg/ face=3DTahoma color=3Dblue size=3D2><U =
title=3Dhttp://www.rp.edu.sg/>www.rp.sg</U></FONT></A><FONT =
face=3DTahoma size=3D2> . Fax: +65 6415-1310 . <BR><EM>&nbsp;From =
<U>April 2006</U>, we will be located in our new home at 9 Woodlands =
Avenue 9,Singapore 738964</EM></FONT></P>
<TR>
<TD>
<P align=3Dcenter><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D1><I>Republic Polytechnic,
=
the first Institute of Higher Learning to fully adopt the Problem-Based
=
Learning approach in Singapore, continues to strive towards best =
practices and maintain excellence in service standards with the =
following certifications: Singapore Quality Class (SQC) certification, =
People Developer Standards and QEHS standards (ISO 9001, 14001 and OHSAS
=
18001 certifications).</I></FONT></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<HR>

<P></P>
<DIV align=3Dcenter>
<TABLE width=3D"100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width=3D"100%"><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D1>CONFIDENTIALITY CAUTION:
=
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
=
whom it is addressed and contains information that is privileged and =
confidential. If you, the reader of this message, are not the intended =
recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this =
communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
=
notify us immediately by return email and delete the original message. =
Thank you. </FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></FONT></FONT></DIV></html>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5E5BD.C898BB2F--

--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

End of Capwap Digest

_______________________________________________
Capwap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap