Subject: [Capwap] Desirable Objectives [Was COMMENT: draft-ietf-capwap-objectives ]

From: "Saravanan Govindan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:02:20 +0800

All,

>From the IESG, 

> 5.2.  Desirable Objectives

Why aren't the items in this section listed as SHOULD instead of MUST?

I would like to get the group's views on this.

In my opinion, the Desirable Objectives as a category is to be listed as
'SHOULD'. However, the individual objectives that make up the category
are still 'MUST', because they represent mandatory operations for the
protocol - provided that the protocol chooses to realize a Desirable
Objective.   

Saravanan

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap