Subject: Re: [Capwap] Issue 184: Should Idle Timeout be per radio, or per WTP, and should the value

From: "Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:26:50 -0700

Given the lack of responses, I will assume the proposed text is
acceptable and will close this issue. 

Pat Calhoun
CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
Cisco Systems

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) 
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 7:14 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Capwap] Issue 184: Should Idle Timeout be per 
> radio, or per WTP,and should the value
> 
> 35) Should Idle Timeout be per radio, or per WTP, and should 
> the value be defined in section 4.5 or 11.
> 
> <PRC> Per WTP.
> 
> Here is the proposed text:
> 
> 4.4.21.  Idle Timeout
> 
>    The Idle Timeout message element is sent by the AC to the WTP to
>    provide it with the idle timeout that it should enforce on 
> its active
>    STA entries.  The value applies for all radios on the WTP. 
> The default
>    value for this message element can be found in Section 4.7 [...]
> 
> 4.7.  CAPWAP Message Element Default Values
> 
>    The WTP and AC MUST support the following default values.  These
>    values may be overriden via explicit notification within a message
>    element.
> 
> 4.7.1.  IdleTimeout
> 
>    The default Idle Timeout is 18000 seconds (5 minutes).
>  
> 
> Pat Calhoun
> CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
> Cisco Systems
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap