Subject: RE: Status on XGSSAPI

From: "Linn, John" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 08:44:29 -0500

The xgss draft has not been actively discussed within the CAT-WG for some
time (the last meeting reference I can locate, e.g., was at the December
1997 meeting) and is not currently pending IESG consideration for
advancement to RFC status. In order to request its progression on behalf of
a WG, IETF procedure requires apparent constituency and consensus on a
document.  Are other WG members also committed to this specification, and/or
awaiting its progression?

--jl

> ----------
> From: 	Jacques Lebastard[SMTP:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 	Wednesday, October 28, 1998 2:02 AM
> To: 	[email-masked]
> Cc: 	Simon Gibson
> Subject: 	Re: Status on XGSSAPI
> 
> Simon Gibson wrote:
> > 
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > Could someone please tell me the status of the XGSSAPI Internet draft?
> It
> > appears to have expired and disappeared. What's the story?
> 
> It has been implemented here. A few adjustments were suggested to one of
> the authors (D. Pinkas). BullSoft will integrate it in its
> AccessMaster's
> GSS-API offer as soon as the RFC gets approved.
> -- 
> Jacques LEBASTARD                 mailto:[email-masked]
> BULL SA - AccessMaster          http://www.openmaster.com/
> Rue Jean Jaures - F3-2G-03           Tel: +33 1 30 80 77 86
> F-78340 Les Clayes sous Bois         Fax: +33 1 30 80 77 99
> ==========================================================================
> This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
> server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
> message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email-masked]
> 
==========================================================================
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email-masked]