Subject: Draft advancement criteria for GSS RFCs?

From: "Linn, John" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:28:38 -0500

CAT-WG:

Last summer, we determined that the CAT-WG had completed IESG submission of
its active and chartered work items, except for those Kerberos documents
which were transitioned to the new Kerberos WG.  It was agreed at that point
that, while not initiating new work, the CAT-WG would remain open as a means
to process subsequent advancement of CAT's RFCs. The goal of this message is
to sample the membership to see whether we have the basis for requesting
that RFCs 2743 and 2744 be advanced to Draft Standards. I'd appreciate any
reports to the list on the state of experience gained with applications
using RFCs 2743 and 2744 as a basis for layering over GSS providers.  

Thanks, regards, ...

--jl
-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email-masked]