Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 05:00:47 +0800

Yes, support to both (as co-author of signalling draft).
&nbsp;
Guoying
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
2011-09-29 

gyzhang 

Lou Berger 
2011-09-28&nbsp; 09:32:13 
CCAMP 
&nbsp;
[CCAMP] Poll on making G.709 Routing and Signaling drafts WGdocuments 

This&nbsp;message&nbsp;starts&nbsp;a&nbsp;two&nbsp;week&nbsp;poll&nbsp;on&nbsp;making&nbsp;the&nbsp;documents&nbsp;listed&nbsp;below
ccamp&nbsp;working&nbsp;group&nbsp;documents.&nbsp;&nbsp;Please&nbsp;send&nbsp;a&nbsp;mail&nbsp;to&nbsp;the&nbsp;mailing&nbsp;list
indicating&nbsp;"yes/support&nbsp;to&nbsp;both"&nbsp;or&nbsp;"no/do&nbsp;not&nbsp;support&nbsp;either".&nbsp;&nbsp;Of
course,&nbsp;you&nbsp;may&nbsp;also&nbsp;support&nbsp;one&nbsp;but&nbsp;not&nbsp;the&nbsp;other.&nbsp;&nbsp;(We&nbsp;will&nbsp;assume
that&nbsp;you&nbsp;support/object&nbsp;to&nbsp;both&nbsp;if&nbsp;you&nbsp;don't&nbsp;specify.)

If&nbsp;indicating&nbsp;no,&nbsp;please&nbsp;state&nbsp;your&nbsp;technical&nbsp;reservations&nbsp;with&nbsp;the
document.

The&nbsp;documents&nbsp;being&nbsp;polled&nbsp;are:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-07
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g709-09

The&nbsp;poll&nbsp;ends&nbsp;Wednesday&nbsp;October&nbsp;12.

Please&nbsp;also&nbsp;bear&nbsp;in&nbsp;mind&nbsp;that&nbsp;WG&nbsp;adoption&nbsp;does&nbsp;not&nbsp;signify&nbsp;that&nbsp;work&nbsp;is
complete&nbsp;on&nbsp;the&nbsp;documents&nbsp;or&nbsp;that&nbsp;the&nbsp;technical&nbsp;details&nbsp;are&nbsp;fixed,&nbsp;but
rather&nbsp;that&nbsp;further&nbsp;development&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;documents&nbsp;will&nbsp;take&nbsp;place&nbsp;based
on&nbsp;WG&nbsp;process.

Much&nbsp;thanks,
Lou&nbsp;(and&nbsp;Deborah)
_______________________________________________
CCAMP&nbsp;mailing&nbsp;list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
&nbsp;