Subject: [CCAMP] Status of draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects (Was: IETF 89 Agenda Posted)

From: Dhruv Dhody <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 05:18:58 +0000

> - WG editors not on the agenda are expect to provide status on
>   the list. 

A new version was posted since adoption, diff at - http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01

- Moved the examples to appendix (clarified that these are for illustration purposes only)
- Companion document to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-04 (on agenda in PCE WG)
- Removed the repeated encodings 
- Editorial changes

Further comments are as always, Welcome! 

Regards,
Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors)	

---------------------------------------------------------------
Dhruv Dhody 
System Architect, 
Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.,
Banagalore
Mobile: +91-9845062422
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which 
is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the 
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial 
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended 
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by 
phone or email immediately and delete it!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCAMP [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: 24 February 2014 19:52
> To: CCAMP
> Subject: [CCAMP] IETF 89 Agenda Posted
> 
> All,
> 	An updated (and hopefully final) agenda has been posted at
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-ccamp.
> 
> Some reminders:
> 
> - WG editors not on the agenda are expect to provide status on
>   the list. Issues/comments may be made at the mic in the
>   1st session.
> 
> - The allotted time on the agenda includes setup/presentation
>   *and* discussion.
> 
> - Please allow sufficient time for discussion on any issues and
>   questions you have for the WG.  Keep in mind that WG discussion
>   and feedback are the main reasons for presenting.
> 
> - To maximize presentation time, the secretary/chairs will post all
>   slides prior to the session and present from a single laptop. Do
>   not expect to present if the slides are made available only at
>   the last minute, or even the day before.
> 
> - Slides should be sent to the secretary *and* chairs by Sunday,
>   March 2nd (any time).
> 
> Much thanks!
> 
> Lou (Deborah and Daniele)
> 
> On 2/17/2014 4:58 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> >
> > All,
> > 	The draft agenda for London was posted earlier today at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-ccamp
> >
> > Please let us (Daniele & chairs) know if you have comments or if we
> > missed anything.
> >
> > Authors of WG documents,
> >
> > As usual:
> >
> > If presenting, please plan to review (present) any changes that have
> > been recently made, any open discussions or issues, as well as planned
> > next steps.
> >
> > If you are not presenting, please send this information to the WG mail
> > list *1 week* prior to the WG meeting.
> >
> > Much thanks,
> > Lou, Deborah (& Daniele)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp