From nobody Mon Aug 16 10:21:18 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118643A137A for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:21:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWPEFpujlkL4 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90EC83A1379 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id i7so24021386iow.1 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:21:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GiAw2SyEJIfcfOBnbsIMBElfImfvhEDIi3D4kCeTPNg=; b=WDjwiWb0rm9/97XznXewKBMSSiSQj2nKQi7Xx+b+BMCfoXCdGdZ7PWH5/tkBibhhD0 Syw42grUoK0S8QaGT90Uds8ANQUOiLJv10JD+7q1tz10Wl5VNWt1ctnwkhlvNkE9MdDD afBLGYiwrTPPnrClqqDNdZHYyo6FIN5WRhOjqpcolS3YERlx67oyu7r/jZOZ0cCds0Gz IgMsPc9oxMWjrBNC2PdP0ZskdcZlCf5WRDtrEqu56R9ZShygbKl4JSZgJY+6Ut2Ds4ZG 00ANEdZNkakWtWNaq+AR0yVKMQJLKKgrBTTzX8udYovTqOliASFJwf6rsrC2vDxolAVC 3IBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=GiAw2SyEJIfcfOBnbsIMBElfImfvhEDIi3D4kCeTPNg=; b=rBDcbDhUsyogsBsjEs/ZAkGNVF5FV0FSzITAbRvNy7rblzmgOoyu2+7/vbe4nrqIJp qAqoJNJXL4Wf/Ggd/qinETc2OPInt4H8AQHkVybsnle6IFuWveP3Zthw2LM4SHWYDB/0 UC5AtO8wWWXCPSiQ2BH5g7kRxJGhIo3IiFKxqRP4NFIyp+nWd7S/ZpoW4AUkRTpCIaV0 SlXy3KtND4ACg3bDm9TIBQXEWTs8BRJY2ylMatcJuoHXB0CmjHPD5y2V2Hqx2i9t/mPo 1XU9YsPGpfjLO9piPhAjI4sJZ0Epnckg89PWINpW9UwbR4Z/6PCRrjANPScVRwPfD+iA eRCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KWKLatU+TQ7OTGCfemMArLzgnkeM+STwT0ea7nQawNrWcdhlU Ns1CLDM4+yKL6kzfEy5d4oCwRgWK1kb8aHHIZ2ZYXRkYH5Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3jXr2Cv4ivsRsX/YsbEVypzvIE1r79WnE3Jr+luOmY4Z2R5aaXdw2E8g3woZDYfPKmiKsee0S4DqvLXiL4To= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:389:: with SMTP id f9mr13767578iov.97.1629134470619; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:21:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <162912646965.4941.4410877011601068362@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <162912646965.4941.4410877011601068362@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Martin Duke Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:20:58 -0700 Message-ID: To: cdni@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000069aa9f05c9b06d71" Archived-At: Subject: [CDNi] Fwd: Last Call: (Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: CDNI Footprint and Capabilities Advertisement using ALTO) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:21:17 -0000 --00000000000069aa9f05c9b06d71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello CDNI WG, I'd like to call your attention to this document that just came out of ALTO. We would very much like your reviews as a part of IETF Last Call. Thanks, Martin Duke Transport AD ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: The IESG Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 8:07 AM Subject: Last Call: (Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: CDNI Footprint and Capabilities Advertisement using ALTO) to Proposed Standard To: IETF-Announce Cc: Vijay Gurbani , , < alto@ietf.org>, , < martin.h.duke@gmail.com> The IESG has received a request from the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization WG (alto) to consider the following document: - 'Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: CDNI Footprint and Capabilities Advertisement using ALTO' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2021-08-30. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The Content Delivery Networks Interconnection (CDNI) framework defines a set of protocols to interconnect CDNs, to achieve multiple goals such as extending the reach of a given CDN to areas that are not covered by that particular CDN. One component that is needed to achieve the goal of CDNI described in CDNI framework is the CDNI Request Routing Footprint & Capabilities Advertisement interface (FCI). RFC 8008 defines precisely the semantics of FCI and provides guidelines on the FCI protocol, but the exact protocol is explicitly outside the scope of that document. This document defines an FCI protocol using the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) protocol, following the guidelines defined in RFC 8008. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. --00000000000069aa9f05c9b06d71 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello CDNI WG,

I'd like to call you= r attention to this document that just came out=C2=A0of ALTO. We would very= much like your reviews as a part of IETF Last Call.

Thanks,
Martin Duke
Transport AD

---------- Forwarded message = ---------
From: The IESG= <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 8:07 = AM
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-16.= txt> (Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: C= DNI Footprint and Capabilities Advertisement using ALTO) to Proposed Standa= rd
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-= announce@ietf.org>
Cc: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>, <alto-chairs@ietf.org>, <alto@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-= alto@ietf.org>, <mart= in.h.duke@gmail.com>



The IESG has received a request from the Application-Layer Traffic
Optimization WG (alto) to consider the following document: - 'Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Request Routing: CDNI
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Footprint and Capabilities Advertisement using ALTO'
=C2=A0 <draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-16.txt> as Proposed= Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final=
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@ietf.org<= /a> mailing lists by 2021-08-30. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@ietf.org= instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


=C2=A0 =C2=A0The Content Delivery Networks Interconnection (CDNI) framework=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0defines a set of protocols to interconnect CDNs, to achieve mu= ltiple
=C2=A0 =C2=A0goals such as extending the reach of a given CDN to areas that= are
=C2=A0 =C2=A0not covered by that particular CDN.=C2=A0 One component that i= s needed to
=C2=A0 =C2=A0achieve the goal of CDNI described in CDNI framework is the CD= NI
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Request Routing Footprint & Capabilities Advertisement int= erface
=C2=A0 =C2=A0(FCI).=C2=A0 RFC 8008 defines precisely the semantics of FCI a= nd provides
=C2=A0 =C2=A0guidelines on the FCI protocol, but the exact protocol is expl= icitly
=C2=A0 =C2=A0outside the scope of that document.=C2=A0 This document define= s an FCI
=C2=A0 =C2=A0protocol using the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALT= O)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0protocol, following the guidelines defined in RFC 8008.





The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.= org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto/



No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.





--00000000000069aa9f05c9b06d71-- From nobody Sun Aug 29 20:26:13 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F893A0873 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3K0Z_K2S_3oe for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2ABB3A0877 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id j4-20020a17090a734400b0018f6dd1ec97so9004258pjs.3 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s3dDQY3K6k+lAS12jq/zMh6kNqYVn4dAQnzn4b5tpXU=; b=k5bvcRmw9y8C5zDGDBNt68Ind1eLpbYyanDkGCP7niPEojtFRpsq2+v09feLrULOHB yK2l/moD9njFbMeHEnC+bfqSk/V5iopm2cRT1bylExYq0/FAnKPA1Xx+kJRGxThxTw4Q AINsC+dljkTQhO4WzwFAvUm9qU5lRzsnEvfBhBTsJecm+KcwoiWlkJg7lgDmZA8eSFWb uTymp5kfLXXL7Awpf389p9C/vQzEI3qtpgF2QqwZAzI1uYs9oRfFtskvYH3Cu9KC/892 S7dE/kTeHVRbYA7udQA11PscK0Fh9q3SkuQC5yXYrp6N0U3v7MiCBKhSb10FpBv0L+ZT EsJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s3dDQY3K6k+lAS12jq/zMh6kNqYVn4dAQnzn4b5tpXU=; b=YFZ48/zMYjy4+c5FcIpndflfitvWdii1M1fb05ncut507P6lfoCIXcaFTqiLe1HtaH Llv6r7eVcTisyNAA0KpfiarnkoIAic+BwH/v7n97BRf6Qyv/hoq/rJREHxVLIV4jyT8W Gr/YMXb7NO4flBzK6o4W9x5XqZSfvVVyWAZg1b47vRdX6fO+0Uh18PfGbVctBdnwNO7v kgqv84wDcF7lpULsUnpA/j6eCxGH+TCd50D6hNfqM+gtYabnSilPmX+Wmp9U2xATtcgr eFHOrr2U+RKbTAUdm4oDpu0sDguiVT7XwJL57d/b184Xh2BWKkvDUVQBWoNIQ/p6BkJd jYHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ybJSjiunIZ0OIhmOGK1dSQYqj5WmiJ9IcN0tM5CGnWFqxSvqu sUSIn5oht2aD+g2rbasd27gAtyS1JUNb1tOfhnfUwoMGvZY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbSwJxrcGZopfnzlk074unN0J3oSk2e/5A2gZfuJ68L4b7Sj3nST95E0lhNciBqv88pVSxJemYOGxq9ASLQXU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:10:: with SMTP id 16mr21895285pja.162.1630293962029; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Ma Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 23:25:51 -0400 Message-ID: To: "" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007c7c1005cabe64a8" Archived-At: Subject: [CDNi] Call for Adoption on draft-sopher-cdni-ci-triggers-rfc8007bis X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 03:26:09 -0000 --0000000000007c7c1005cabe64a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi All, As we discussed in the session at IETF 111, the triggers extension draft (draft-ietf-cdni-triggers-extensions-09) that was originally adopted after IETF 103 has been revised to be a full bis draft of the triggers interface. This was done to make the protocol easier to understand, in a single RFC. We believe this is a productive change in direction. The authors have submitted a new document with the same content for easier change tracking. As this is the same content that was previously adopted, just reformatted, readoption seems reasonable. This is the official Call for Adoption. If you have thoughts or opinions, in favor or against, please comment on this thread. The latest version of the doc is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sopher-cdni-ci-triggers-rfc8007bis This CFA will stay open for two weeks and close on September 13, 2021. thanx! -- Kevin and Sanjay --0000000000007c7c1005cabe64a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,

= =C2=A0 As we discussed in the session at IETF 111, the triggers extension d= raft (draft-ietf-cdni-triggers-extensions-09) that was originally adopted a= fter IETF 103 has been revised to be a full bis draft of the triggers inter= face.=C2=A0 This was done to make the protocol easier to understand, in a s= ingle RFC.=C2=A0 We believe this is a productive change in direction.=C2=A0= The authors have submitted a new document with the same content for easier= change tracking.=C2=A0 As this is the same content that was previously ado= pted, just reformatted, readoption seems reasonable.=C2=A0 This is the offi= cial=C2=A0Call for Adoption.=C2=A0 If you have thoughts or opinions, in fav= or or against, please comment on this thread.

=C2= =A0 The latest version of the doc is here:=C2=A0https://dat= atracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sopher-cdni-ci-triggers-rfc8007bis

=C2=A0 This CFA will stay open for two weeks and clos= e on September 13, 2021.

thanx!

--=C2=A0 Kevin and Sanjay
--0000000000007c7c1005cabe64a8-- From nobody Sun Aug 29 20:26:17 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cdni@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FDF3A0873 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVn4HtDSxAbV for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0C73A0878 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id 18so11061646pfh.9 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=AEZ6SYwIxiC4oZZJ1H8Fqv7Y/pnJtmeGclCkJw/jVCs=; b=EHyvp451+a6um2D52Eq8rM1ALsg2rJPVoM2QXBuROAwto6jtWknFFXJc/GCNzhNJ8i T+1qEhaPMSf9F0dNBude3XDFyb5jurAkBrqKR/e2QNCYduqUyAAmTfJX/I7CkE0Q/Ns6 eZt2UQNRczQiKH6De21UD26zwLlp4dhyW76yuZitn/17E+GitNscdKgo6elIgEB6IEoK kb8NZqqegkze/6VPrD47hhLJILrO2xos5VFaiILIxBa3FJa3YnYnO3A8ngpK28mRck4l ZpJQ+53TkrczcO5aVRAmJf7pu7m4NR7033wpHqjAJq8L4JQVacYwEQMVBlVi9IwixuI/ TQfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=AEZ6SYwIxiC4oZZJ1H8Fqv7Y/pnJtmeGclCkJw/jVCs=; b=qBFlTyo70/gdvvjEzziD0+Lv6q3wmNjcJ4wtNPxujXB1gSy49mAAEmY8wdtDaWgvxM jUPahA+XVY6TIYb1+PYwqI1qg6NNb7RApBY/PbadX3de88iL11jGFsEtg3+LcmqlZUJ8 Yn4a0P0jZMIVNwr4xK/XwJ4chLZHWJ3lHtuXBcVMPrXjQtEgrAb+4uJfeHaltasODjHd tjmmNFKbKsTbX9q5AXpLEzc/tHBEccmWqBxNCCQSlmKd1YIjRIsQcXafdFSmT+6NviF3 /5w7bsL7fGcV7IB7DdHr0UPfQLc/vWFCmKM4R2zZjKrJ/vgmsSTFfWRO4hDXMLJCBW+n puug== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zR9STmmmlhBjqpsynXrtDyEBGAlMBB6n6lC1bQ3IxRu0lFzJv dkUNhieXSPzfHcWQYHoWNNs5hU4NUeTSXvq3taCAFp2u8uE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOK8L0Zh6pXL5OnK9IvcEABiSKD3zoS3qIM2gFk6hJGYBLGep0OUvBB7rGLJNOkgu0gWJOyZxXhD6p5/CfYms= X-Received: by 2002:a62:5c7:0:b029:3e0:dd9c:8fd2 with SMTP id 190-20020a6205c70000b02903e0dd9c8fd2mr21460952pff.28.1630293964496; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 20:26:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Ma Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 23:25:53 -0400 Message-ID: To: "" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a2231605cabe64a8" Archived-At: Subject: [CDNi] Call for Adoption on draft-sopher-cdni-footprint-types-extensions X-BeenThere: cdni@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is to discuss issues associated with the Interconnection of Content Delivery Networks \(CDNs\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 03:26:11 -0000 --000000000000a2231605cabe64a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi All, As we discussed in the session at IETF 111, there are two new proposed footprint types: one for ISO3166-2 codes and another for explicit unions for heterogeneous footprint types. Both seem like reasonable and useful additions. This is the official Call for Adoption. If you have thoughts or opinions, in favor or against, please comment on this thread. The latest version of the doc is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sopher-cdni-footprint-types-extensions This CFA will stay open for two weeks and close on September 13, 2021. thanx! -- Kevin and Sanjay --000000000000a2231605cabe64a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,

=C2=A0 As we discussed in the s= ession at IETF 111, there are two new proposed footprint types: one for ISO= 3166-2 codes and another for explicit unions for heterogeneous footprint ty= pes.=C2=A0 Both seem like reasonable and useful additions.=C2=A0 This is th= e official=C2=A0Call for Adoption.=C2=A0 If you have thoughts or opinions, = in favor or against, please comment on this thread.

=C2=A0 The latest version of the doc is here:=C2=A0ht= tps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sopher-cdni-footprint-types-exten= sions

=C2=A0 This CFA will stay open for two w= eeks and close on September 13, 2021.

thanx!
=

--=C2=A0 Kevin and Sanjay
--000000000000a2231605cabe64a8--