Subject: [Cfrg] BLS Signature for X.509

From: Antonio Sanso <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 06:57:29 +0000

hi *, 

sorry for the noise. 
I was wondering if it was already discussed the idea to use BSL Signature for X.509.
AFAIK this will avoid certificate chains thanks to the signature aggregation property…
If this was already discussed I apologize. 
If not WDYT about this? 

regards

antonio