Subject: [dhcwg] Comments on draft-joshi-dhc-dhcpv6-aggr-route-opt-00

From: "hermin anggawijaya" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:21:23 +1300

In the draft's presentation today, there was a mention of the author's plan to include 
metric information for each aggregated route, although it's not in the current draft itself.

I would think that a route tag would be more useful considering that a metric can be interpreted
differently depending on the IGP used, whereas a tag can facilitate local interpretation on
how the route should be treated in general (mapping to certain metric, route filtering etc),
ie. a tag will not cause metric interpretation issue, as well as can be useful in manipulation
of the associated route.

Also I think this draft could be useful.

Hermin

NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the addressee
named above. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message you are hereby notified that you must not
disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.
If you have received this message in error please
notify Allied Telesis Labs Ltd immediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender has the
authority to issue and specifically states them to
be the views of Allied Telesis Labs.