Subject: Re: [dhcwg] review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option

From: Alissa Cooper <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:33:45 +0100

James Polk wrote:

> This wasn't my idea. This was something several members of the Geopriv WG wanted, and the chairs directed me to incorporate it into the draft.
> Geopriv as a WG is worried about location information becoming or being stale (i.e., old or out of date or "no longer valid/applicable"). I tried to argue that what this doc does is create a means to download the URI pointing to the location information (of a client) that can change without updating the URI.But some believed (and still do) that if the location of the client changes, so must the URI.
> I lost that battle.

Hi James -- Could you post a link to the geopriv discussion you are referencing?

Thanks,
Alissa