Subject: Fwd: Re:Discrepancy in the Event MIB draft

From: Randy Presuhn <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:13:57 -0700 (PDT)

Hi -

Yet another non-subscriber post to the disman WG mailing list.
It looks like those Cisco folks really like to send out
that HTML.  ;-)

 -------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn           [email-masked]
 Voice: +1 408 546-1006  BMC Software, Inc.  1-3141
 Fax:   +1 408 965-0359  2141 North First Street
 http://www.bmc.com/     San José, California 95131  USA
 -------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 -------------------------------------------------------

> Received: from starling.bmc.com (starling.bmc.com [172.17.0.113])
> 	by Dorothy.Bmc.Com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA23773
> 	for <[email-masked]>; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by starling.bmc.com (8.10.1/8.8.6) with SMTP id e5FBoRD17158
> 	for <[email-masked]>; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 06:50:28 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: from cisco.com ([192.135.247.233])
> 	by cbin2-mail.cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA09561;
> 	Thu, 15 Jun 2000 17:19:17 +0530 (IST)
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 17:19:40 +0530
> From: Jayashree <[email-masked]>
> Reply-To: [email-masked]
> Organization: Cisco Systems
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: [email-masked]
> CC: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
> Subject: Re:Discrepancy in the Event MIB draft
>  (draft-ietf-disman-event-mib-09.txt)
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>  boundary="------------E1EABB51353747A86945A47B"
>
>
> --------------E1EABB51353747A86945A47B
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi Ram
>    Well there was a misalignment in the previous mail regarding the
> change . Please note that the change is now been indicated by a bold
> Font.
>
> According to the Disman Event MIB draft
> (draft-ietf-disman-event-mib-09.txt) -:
>
> <Snip>
>
> mteTriggerThresholdStartup OBJECT-TYPE
>
> Description -:
> "The event that may be triggered when this entry is first set to
> 'active' and a new instance of the object at mteTriggerValueID is found.
>
> If the first sample after this instance becomes active is greater than
> or equal to mteTriggerThresholdRising and
> mteTriggerThresholdStartup is equal to 'rising' or 'risingOrFalling',
> then one mteTriggerThresholdRisingEvent is triggered for that
> instance.
>
> If the first sample after this entry becomes active is less than or
> equal to mteTriggerThresholdFalling and mteTriggerThresholdStartup
> is equal to 'falling' or 'risingOrFalling', then one
> mteTriggerThresholdRisingEvent is triggered for that instance."
>
> <Snip>
>
> In my opinion this should be changed to the description given below
>
> Description -:
> "The event that may be triggered when this entry is first set to
> 'active' and a new instance of the object at mteTriggerValueID is found.
>
> If the first sample after this  instance becomes active is greater than
> or equal to
> mteTriggerThresholdRising and mteTriggerThresholdStartup is equal to
> 'rising' or 'risingOrFalling', then one
> mteTriggerThresholdRisingEvent is triggered for that instance.
>
> If the first sample after this entry becomes active is less than or
> equal to mteTriggerThresholdFalling and  mteTriggerThresholdStartup
> is equal to 'Falling' or 'risingOrFalling', then one
> mteTriggerThresholdFallingEvent is triggered for that instance."
>
> Thanx
> Jaya
>
>
> --------------E1EABB51353747A86945A47B
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
> <html>
> Hi Ram
> <br>&nbsp;&nbsp; Well there was a misalignment in the previous mail regarding
> the change . Please note that the change is now been indicated by a <b>bold
> Font.</b>
> <p>According to the Disman Event MIB draft (draft-ietf-disman-event-mib-09.txt)
> -:
> <p>&lt;Snip>
> <p>mteTriggerThresholdStartup OBJECT-TYPE
> <p>Description -:
> <br>"The event that may be triggered when this entry is first set to 'active'
> and a new instance of the object at mteTriggerValueID is found.
> <p>If the first sample after this instance becomes active is greater than
> or equal to mteTriggerThresholdRising and
> <br>mteTriggerThresholdStartup is equal to 'rising' or 'risingOrFalling',
> then one mteTriggerThresholdRisingEvent is triggered for that
> <br>instance.
> <p>If the first sample after this entry becomes active is less than or
> equal to mteTriggerThresholdFalling and mteTriggerThresholdStartup
> <br>is equal to 'falling' or 'risingOrFalling', then one mteTriggerThresholdRisingEvent
> is triggered for that instance."
> <p>&lt;Snip>
> <p>In my opinion this should be changed to the description given below
> <p>Description -:
> <br>"The event that may be triggered when this entry is first set to 'active'
> and a new instance of the object at mteTriggerValueID is found.
> <p>If the first sample after this&nbsp; instance becomes active is greater
> than or equal to
> <br>mteTriggerThresholdRising and mteTriggerThresholdStartup is equal to
> 'rising' or 'risingOrFalling', then one
> <br>mteTriggerThresholdRisingEvent is triggered for that instance.
> <p>If the first sample after this entry becomes active is less than or
> equal to mteTriggerThresholdFalling and&nbsp; mteTriggerThresholdStartup
> <br>is equal to 'Falling' or 'risingOrFalling', then one <b>mteTriggerThresholdFallingEvent</b>
> is triggered for that instance."
> <br>&nbsp;
> <br>Thanx
> <br>Jaya
> <br>&nbsp;</html>
>
> --------------E1EABB51353747A86945A47B--
>
>