From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:33:54 -0700 (PDT)

Comments on draft-ietf-disman-conditionmib-04.txt
Sender: [email-masked]
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: IETF disman Working Group mailing list <disman.dorothy.bmc.com>

1. The MIB requires some patches to make it compile-
     a. IMPORT mib-2
     b. terminate the IMPORTS clause with a ';'
     c. in arcTable DESCRIPTION (line 343)
         s/"/'/
     d. line 394
        s/IANAItuProbableCause/IANAItuProbableCauseOrZero/
     e. in the COMPLIANCES section there are some irrelevant
        lines
        delete 560-570
     f. We may want to add arcStorageType to the arcSettingGroup

2. Other nits.
     s/MAC-ACCESS/MAX-ACCESS/g

Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> We're halfway through the disman WG last calls on the two
> alarm-related documents.  I have seen no comments yet, and
> have not even received any indication that anyone has read
> either of the drafts.  This does not bode well.
> 
> If you do not want to see this work unceremoniously dumped
> for lack of interest / progress, I strongly suggest reading
> the documents, and sending your comments (favorable or
> otherwise) to the disman WG mailing list.
> 
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  SJC-1.3141
>  [email-masked]  2141 North First Street
>  Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San José, California 95131  USA
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
>  ------------------------------------------------------