Subject: recluse temptation

From: "Tobias Armstrong" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:23:53 -0500

Farmers willemancipate themselves from the thralldom created by the fear of theparasite. This is the theme of the present chapter. It has been widelynoticed in the press all over the Empire.
After floweringthe crop was smothered by a mildew; no seed was harvested. Nevertheless the gain per acre obtainedby changing the variety is as a rule small.
My personal experience in India has been repeated all over theworld.
There is, however, a great differencein the way these foods are grown. No soil analysis can tell me as much as the trees will.
This is the theme of the present chapter.
Farmers willemancipate themselves from the thralldom created by the fear of theparasite.
A certain amount of supporting evidence is already available. This measure has brought the populationunder close medical observation for a quarter of a century.
Three favourable factors probably accounted for thisresult.
This could be produced or avoided at will bycareful attention to cultivation and irrigation.
In all this he followed the science of the moment.
According to this theory the plant fed on humus. Three favourable factors probably accounted for thisresult.
No healthcampaign can succeed unless the materials of which the bodies are builtare sound. It now remains to sum up this experience and to offer suggestions forthe future. The chief pest of fruit-trees at Quetta was green-fly soon after theyoung leaves appeared. A number of other developments have taken place which must briefly bementioned.
Failureto perceive this obvious fact is the main reason why Liebig and hisdisciples went astray. These have already beendescribed and need not be repeated. Exceptin a few cases, food is not marketed according to the way it is grown.
The rest of the plot escaped infection and grewnormally.
Dothe mineral residues in the soil need renewal as humus does? In all ofthese the mycorrhizal association occurs. Lucerne was always grown in the fruit orchards, and regularlytop-dressed with farm-yard manure.
Against this the efforts of thedoctor resemble those of Sisiphus.
Itoccurs in most if not all our cultivated plants. Even our country people share the whitebread, tinned salmon, dried milk regime. There is, however, a great differencein the way these foods are grown.
Failureto perceive this obvious fact is the main reason why Liebig and hisdisciples went astray.
On this latter count there is no room for complacency. Nature has provided a marvellous pieceof machinery for conferring disease-resistance on the crop. It obviously necessitated agreat deal of chemical work under my personal control. How does the produce of an impoverished soil affect the men and womenwho have to consume it?
This at once attracted the attention ofagriculturists. According to this theory the plant fed on humus.