Subject: Re: NSEC3 Issue 9: Potential DoS on Resolvers

From: Alex Bligh <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:31:16 +0000

--On 24 February 2006 18:11 +0000 Geoffrey Sisson <[email-masked]> 
wrote:

> The problem with the 10% non-kidding part is that a malicious/ignorant
> zone operator could put the value in this RR arbitrarily high, too.

That was why I was (again 90% kidding) suggesting it got inherited
from its parent.

Alex

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>