Subject: Re: [dnsext] WG meeting or interim meeting about "name equivalence"

From: "YAO Jiankang" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:04:20 +0800

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Sullivan" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 6:17 AM
Subject: [dnsext] WG meeting or interim meeting about "name equivalence"

> Dear colleagues,
> 
> As you may recall, Olafur and I announced some time ago that we were
> planning not to convene a WG meeting in Anaheim unless something
> significant came up or we had signficant interest expressed.
> 
> We have determined that the recent discussion of the general topic of
> making two names completely equivalent in the DNS requires some
> real-time conversation.  We have two options before us.
> 
> The first is to schedule a session at the Anaheim meeting.

+1

> 
> The second is to schedule an interim WG virtual meeting.  

+1

maybe, rename " two options" to "two steps"

step 1:  schedule an interim WG virtual meeting
setp 2:  schedule a session at the Anaheim meeting

Yao Jiankang