Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale

From: Puneet Sood <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 09:27:46 -0400

Dear dnsop members,

At this point we believe we have addressed all questions and comments
on the draft. Please let us know if there are any more comments.

Thanks,
Puneet

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:41 PM Suzanne Woolf <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 2, 2019, at 10:01 AM, Paul Hoffman <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 2, 2019, at 6:36 AM, Suzanne Woolf <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >> First, there have been several IPR disclosures against this document. The chairs believe all have been resolved.
> >
> > Please clarify what "The chairs believe all have been resolved" means in this context. There are seven IPR statements on the document.
>
> The seven IPR statements relate to disclosures regarding IP of three companies, Google, Akamai, and Cisco. In all three cases, those companies appear to have put licensing terms regarding the patents referred to into the data tracker; there are no disclosures that haven’t been acknowledged by the stated holders of the IP, or that the holder has promised to update later.
>
> Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale for the details.
>
> Note also the boilerplate at https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/. Neither the chairs nor the IETF has any opinion on the content of any of those statements, we do however note they exist.
>
>
> Suzanne
> (For the chairs)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop