Subject: AW: AW: AW: [Ecrit] requirements

From: Tschofenig Hannes <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:59:12 +0100

hi james, 

since our terminology on these issues i pretty messy it is difficult to say
what it is. 
i like the detailed questions listed in henning's previous mail. they do not
focus on a particular term but instead they list certain properties. looking
on these properties makes everything simpler for us.  

is this reasonable? 

ciao
hannes

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: James M. Polk [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 20:49
> An: Tschofenig Hannes; 'Henning Schulzrinne'
> Cc: Ciesla, Larry; [email-masked]
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Ecrit] requirements
> 
> 
> At 08:34 PM 3/23/2005 +0100, Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > Allowed by whom? Do we assume that one has to have a license
> > > to provide
> > > such services? Who would hand out such licenses? (As far 
> as I know,
> > > nobody has licensed Columbia University to provide 
> telecommunication
> > > services and I guess we thus would not be able to legally provide
> > > campus-level location information.)
> >
> >that's exactly my point.
> >if we dig deeper into the authorization issues then we 
> encounter various
> >problems.
> 
> Isn't "location validation" another form of "authorized location 
> information for usage"?
> 
> Is this part of our message routing charter?
> 
> 
> >ciao
> >hannes
> >
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ecrit mailing list
> >[email-masked]
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> 
> 
> cheers,
> James
> 
>                                 *******************
>                  Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
> 

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit