Subject: RE: [Ecrit] draft review <draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-req -01.txt>

From: "Abbott, Nadine B." <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 07:18:46 -0500

In addition, in North America, the term "Enhanced" is used to indicate that
the emergency call is routed to an appropriate answering point based on the
caller's location.  
Nadine

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
Henning Schulzrinne
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 8:25 PM
To: Tschofenig Hannes
Cc: [email-masked]'
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] draft review
<draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-req-01.txt>

Thanks for your comments. Some quick responses below:

    Enhanced emergency service: Enhanced emergency services add the
       ability to identify the caller identity and/or caller location to
       basic emergency services.  (Sometimes, only the caller location
       may be known, e.g., from a public access point that is not owned
       by an individual.)

[hannes] why is this differentiation necessary?

Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
> hi henning,
> 
> i quickly read through your draft and here are a few high level comments:
>   * good document with an impressive list of requirements
>     (also addresses security specific requirements)
>   * i wonder whether the other draft authors have read this document. 
> it would be good to know how their requirements relate to the 
> requirements raised in this document.
> 
> things to improve with this document: 
>   * a few sections address topics that are outside the scope of ecrit

Those will be deleted.

>   * terminology needs to be enhanced and fixed
>   * a number of security related requirements have been addressed in 
> the document but the
>     security consideration section requires more work

>   * some people might argue that the language in the document is a bit 
> too sip focused

Well, this started as a SIPPING document... One high-level decision to 
be made is whether we assume that calls reach PSAPs via SIP, even if 
after translation. Clearly, some parts will be independent of the 
signaling protocol, but I don't think there's much point in having PSAPs 
support some smorgasbord of signaling protocols since that would only 
work if everybody supported everything.

> 
> some some very minor comments at : 
> http://www.ietf-ecrit.org/comments/draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency
> -req-0
> 1_hannes.txt
> 
> ciao
> hannes
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit