Subject: Re: [Ecrit] requirements

From: "James M. Polk" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:13:43 -0600

At 08:02 PM 3/23/2005 +0100, Stastny Richard wrote:

>Authorizazion, authentication. identification, etc is only a nice to have

thank you for making my point

>Richard
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>Von: [email-masked] im Auftrag von James M. Polk
>Gesendet: Mi 23.03.2005 19:53
>An: Tschofenig Hannes; 'Ken Carlberg'; [email-masked]
>Betreff: Re: AW: [Ecrit] requirements
>
>
>
>At 07:24 PM 3/23/2005 +0100, Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
>
> >maybe we just have a terminology problem here. i think that we need to
> >provide authentication in order to provide authorization and accountability.
>
>Are you authorized to place a 911 call with your IP phone when you're in
>the US?
>
>How exactly is this going to be accomplished (even in general)? And what
>does that have to do with routing the set-up messages to the correct ECC
>(which is ECRIT's charter)?
>
>I do not believe these very useful attributes are within ECRIT's current
>charter, so they shouldn't be the focus of so many messages on this list.
>
> >ciao
> >hannes
>
>
>cheers,
>James
>
>                                 *******************
>                  Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

cheers,
James

                                *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit