Subject: AW: AW: [Ecrit] requirements

From: Tschofenig Hannes <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:09:29 +0100

hi james, 

> 
> At 07:24 PM 3/23/2005 +0100, Tschofenig Hannes wrote:
> 
> >maybe we just have a terminology problem here. i think that 
> we need to
> >provide authentication in order to provide authorization and 
> accountability.

i forgot to add: "if you want to provide this functionality at all."

> 
> Are you authorized to place a 911 call with your IP phone 
> when you're in 
> the US?
> 
> How exactly is this going to be accomplished (even in 
> general)? And what 
> does that have to do with routing the set-up messages to the 
> correct ECC 
> (which is ECRIT's charter)?
> 
> I do not believe these very useful attributes are within 
> ECRIT's current 
> charter, so they shouldn't be the focus of so many messages 
> on this list.

security requirements and threats are within the scope of the charter. 

ciao
hannes

> 
> >ciao
> >hannes
> 
> 
> cheers,
> James
> 
>                                 *******************
>                  Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
> 

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit