Subject: [Emu] Issue #12: TLS Extensions

From: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:02:31 -0700

#12: TLS Extensions

 > Section 4.2.1.3
 >
 > "  In order to meet the requirements in this document TLS
 > extensions MAY
 >    be used.  For example, TLS extensions may be useful in providing
 >    certificate revocation information via the TLS OCSP extension
(thus
 >    meeting the requirement in Section 4.5.1.3)."
 >
 > Why is it necessary to include optional requirements in this
document?
 > Presumably the selection will only be influenced by MUST and
 > SHOULD requirements, right?
 >
 This section is just stating that it is acceptable to use TLS
extensions
 to meet requirements.  I don't see a problem here.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/trac/ticket/12>
emu <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/>