Subject: Re: [Extra] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-quota-06

From: Lars Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:58:43 +0300

Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document (the IESG needs to approve a DOWNREF).

Lars

> On 2021-9-14, at 7:46, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-extra-quota-06
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review Date: 2021-09-13
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-09-10
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: The document describes an extension (QUOTA extension) to allow
> administrative limits on resource usage to be manipulated by IMAP protocol.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Section 5.1 first paragraph:
> " they MUST NOT refuse to APPEND a message if the  limit less the usage is
> smaller than the RFC822.SIZE divided by 1024"
> 
> does it mean "must break the message" if the limit minus the usage is smaller
> than  RFC822.size/1024?
> 
> "APPEND a message": what message is to be appended?
> 
> Why "divide by 1024"?
> 
> Thank you
> Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art